Physician
Product Documents
PNA FISH Documents
Brochure - PNA FISH for Gram-Negatives
Pseudomonal vs. Non-Pseudomonal Therapy
PI - KT008 - US
US Package Insert for EK/P. aeruginosa PNA FISH
Scientific Papers
Utility of PNA FISH for Rapid Dection of Acinetobacter and P. aeruginosa
PNA FISH testing is a rapid and highly sensitive and specific method for the detection of troublesome Gram-negative...
Scientific Posters
ASM 2010 - Direct Detection and Identification of Bacteria in Urine Using PNA FISH
Rapid identification of UTI causing bacteria enables physicians to use more targeted therapy, which is particularly important in...
ASM 2010 - Evaluation of GNR Traffic Light(TM) PNA FISH
GNR Traffic Light PNA FISH provides a highly accurate identification of three major pathogens in under 90 minutes. This assay...
ASM 2010 - Rapid ID of Microorganisms in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Using PNA FISH
This test can be completed in 35 minutes with 5 minutes of hands on time. It is accurate and capable of giving the physician...
Evaluation of E.coli/P.aeruginosa PNA FISH and EK/P.aeruginosa PNA FISH: two dual color assays for identification of Gram negative rods directly from positive blood culture bottles
Using two PNA FISH assays we were able to identify 76% (42/55) of our blood stream pathogens. The E. coli/P. aeruginosa...
ASM 2007 - Evaluation of E. coli/P. aeruginosa PNA FISH and EK/P. aeruginosa PNA FISH
are rapid and accurate methods for identification of E. coli, E. coli or K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa directly from positive...
ASM Biofilms 2007 - The P. aeruginosa burden of the CF lung
Deparaffinized sections were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probes.
ASM 2006 - PNA FISH for Rapid Detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae from Positive Blood Cultures
To evaluate the analytical performance of a new PNA FISH assay for Klebsiella pneumoniae with 39 well characterized strains...
GNR - EK/P. aeruginosa PNA FISH
For in vitro diagnostic use.
EK/P. aeruginosa PNA FISH® (Cat. No. KT008) is a multicolor, qualitative nucleic acid hybridization assay intended for identification of E. coli and/or K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa on smears from positive blood cultures containing Gram-negative rods. The EK/P. aeruginosa PNA FISH assay is indicated for use in conjunction with positive blood subcultures as an aid in the identification of E. coli/K. pneumoniae and/or P. aeruginosa.
EK/P. aeruginosa PNA FISH provides rapid identification of both E. coli and/or K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa on smears made directly from Gram-negative rod (GNR)-positive blood cultures and is compatible with all major blood culture media. The 2.5 hours fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay uses fluorescently labeled peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probes that target the species-specific ribosomal RNA (rRNA) of E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa. Results are visualized using fluorescence microscopy. E. coli and/or K. pneumoniae is identified as multiple bright green fluorescent rods in multiple fields of view, whereas P. aeruginosa is identified as multiple bright red fluorescent rods in multiple fields of view. The absence of fluorescence indicates another species is present in the positive blood culture.
Features and Benefits
Results Reporting - Rapid Identification of GNR+ Blood Cultures
Once a blood culture turns positive, a Gram stain is performed. If the Gram stain reveals Gram-negative rods, EK/P. aeruginosa PNA FISH is performed and within a few hours, results are available and can be reported to the attending physician.
Optimizing Antibiotic Therapy for Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections (BSI)
- Provides rapid identification of E. coli/K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa from GNR positive blood cultures 24-48 hours sooner than conventional methods
- Helps clinicians optimize therapy for patients with GNR bloodstream infections
- Enables clinical to provide early, appropriate therapy for E. coli/K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa infections
Gram-negative BSIs are considered one of the most serious hospital-acquired infections, accounting for approximately 25% of all BSI’s, afflicting 100,000 patients annually in the US alone. Gram-negative BSIs are associated with high mortality rates and can be difficult to treat due in part to increasing resistance to a multitude of antibiotic agents, especially for P. aeruginosa. Treatment challenges are further compounded by current laboratory testing methods for Gram-negative pathogen identification that can take 24-48 hours, forcing clinicians to treat patients empirically. As a result, a single Gram-negative bacteremia case can result in extra length of stay between 5 and 24 days, costing institutions between $40,000 and $60,000.(1,2)
Early differentiation between these species can improve antibiotic therapy selection as P. aeruginosa species are often highly virulent and frequently multi-drug resistant, where in some cases E. coli and K. pneumoniae species may require less aggressive therapy. Since traditional methods take days to discriminate between these two species, Gram-negative BSI patients are either subject to broader-than-necessary antibiotic therapy increasing resistance and the risk of toxicity complications, or are undertreated, escalating the potential for adverse patient outcomes.(2)
While conventional laboratory methods can take up to 2 days or more, EK/P. aeruginosa PNA FISH enables microbiology labs to provide clinicians rapid, accurate species identification results in hours not days. In addition, rapid identification of E. coli and/or K. pneumoniae may allow laboratories to improve workflow and turn-around times for susceptibility results through earlier initiation of such tests as the Hodge disk-diffusion for carbapenem resistance. Studies show that providing a 24 hours “head start” on appropriate narrow-spectrum therapy for Gram-negative bloodstream infections can improve clinical outcomes, reduce antibiotic resistance rates and reduce the incidences of adverse events (2,3)
This first rapid, molecular diagnostic assay for identification of Gram-negative rod species from positive blood cultures will enable clinicians to ensure early and appropriate treatment for patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infections.
- Kang et al. Bloodstream Infections Caused by Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: Risk Factors for Mortality and Impact of Inappropriate Initial Antimicrobial Therapy on Outcome. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2005 Feb; 49:760-766 - Link
- Slama et al. Gram-negative antibiotic resistance: there is a price to pay. Critical Care. 2008 May;12 Sup 4:1-9 - Link
- Thom et al. Impact of Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy on Outcomes in Patients with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteremia: A Cohort Study. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2008 Sept; 8(116) - Link
PN1623A